Cleveland is in an Urban Slump 

                               Citizens Echo the Reasons – Politicians Excuse Them Away
                                                 Elections Bring Both Sides Together 
                                         Democracy Peaks In the Struggle To Be Heard

                           Part four - A Landscape of Blight – to a Politicians Delight

                                                            January 1, 2009

  Joe Santiago has been nurturing a lie since he became councilman for Ward 14 three years ago. The origin of the lie can be traced to the mayor’s office, which Frank Jackson could if ethics prevailed snuff out. And if ethics were business practices in the offices of Ward 13, Councilman Joe Cimperman, and

17, Matthew Zone, citizen's from both sides of town, would have heard the dissension by now. The lie is causing the public to wonder, where is the openness? The promise of federal funds, $400,000 distributed yearly to all wards is a lie. Citizens in Ward 14 have only received a fraction of the total. Are there other wards that are getting less than promised? The promise will remain a lie until Jackson and all members of Council decide that honesty is the best policy. Dispense the funds in a way that removes the lie. The policy needs a rewrite by Santiago, Jackson, Cimperman and Zone with approval of the final draft from all council members. Citizens may not like the outcome, but most would welcome the truthfulness.

Since becoming councilman, Santiago watched as tens of thousands of federal grant dollars shift from the community he is suppose to represent, into other wards. Many citizens have asked why, why the shift of funds from a community where the poverty level is much higher, to where the money was placed. Santiago claimed at times, he had no authority over where the finances go. True, in more ways than one, but the one most heard, is the City’s Department of Community Development. They have the authority and responsibility for dispersing the wealth to where it’s needed the most. And it is that answer that led to the question, what did Santiago do to stop the flow into areas where the need was less noted? What did Santiago do in defending the concerns of Ward 14 citizens inside City Hall? Where are the citizens who witnessed Santiago’s passionate plea in Council chambers to keep the federal grant money, promised to Ward 14 citizens from slipping away? Santiago remained silent to the question I (citizen echoes) asked. Not surprising. He answers to a higher power.

Frank Jackson is the higher power. Officials at The City’s Department of Community Development answer to him. If Jackson does not like where the federal funds go, he can change directions without much dissension from members of Council. Their loyalty to Jackson is something citizens never want to see happen among legislators in Columbus, toward governors, nor in D.C. with the presidents. In caparison to the diverse robust opinions (voice of the people) heard from the legislative bodies in Columbus and D.C., citizens in Cleveland can only imagine hearing their own concerns echo off the walls Council chambers. The stealing of federal funds from Ward 14 citizens is hardly mentioned during Council meetings in City Hall.

Yes, stealing. If it is not so, remove the BIG LIE that most politicians like to talk about at election time. The lie is $400,000. in federal tax funds, every ward is supposed to receive yearly. This is the BIG LIE. Are their citizens in other wards beside those in 14 that  robbed of funds? Remove the BIG LIE! Tell citizens the truth. The truth is federal funds are dispersed to the wards at the discretion of the City’s Department of Community Development…with Jackson’s blessing and most of Council’s steadfast allegiance…at least until thoughts center on forthcoming elections, which cause some leaders to turn on the dramatics against the mayor. I’m sure the words, stealing and robbed, will or should offend some leaders, so I’m including a traditional remark familiar to most politicians, which sounds less incriminating. Promises made and promise broken. Now, if there are politicians who feel, I’m leading reader’s into believing something that is not, email the truth, which will be placed at the bottom of this article. 

And perhaps there are Council members who take offence to the insertion of the word “allegiance” in support of Jackson’s brilliant ideas. A recent idea of Jackson’s which received Council’s stamp-of-approval, needs a critical review…by the candidates who may be in the early stages of campaigning for Council seats. I could be wrong, but I feel all candidates should monitor Jackson and Council’s excitement over a new business venture. If it turns out to be a fluke, candidates have a hot (truthful) issue to talk about when the November election nears.

Ever since a few Hollywood production companies came to town to makes films, the buzzword was, give them the key to the city for future filmmaking. Good idea, filmmakers drop a lot of money, by hiring local citizens, renting spaces to live, work and spend greens on sports and entertainment. Hay, when the “Spiderman” production company hit town, money was spread all over town. Now the “good idea” from Jackson/Council was to bait-the-hook with a lure that would have more film crews coming back to town.

But I wonder who caught whom in the business of making money. My money is on the other guy. Not the twenty-two politicians who sealed the deal. The lure was free rent at the old convention center, which went to the production company, Nehst Creations. Nehst at this point in time does not seem to have a good business track record…at least from the research I did. Under the Nehst banner, the firm had not released any films to date. One, a documentary, “Running America” is scheduled for release in March of this year. When making deals, doesn’t it make sense to revue the financial strength of the company before hand? The film could become a winner or looser but for now, predictability is not a wise choice in business deals. Another film, a horror flick “Ratred” is in the making and scheduled for release sometime in 2010. It seems to me that a better deal for Clevelanders (not City Hall), would have been opening the free space at the old convention center, to the homeless during the bitter cold months and wait to see if, “Running America” is a money-maker before talking business with Nehst.

I repeat, all candidates for Council seats should monitor the above business transaction with the PD taking the lead. And if it goes belly up, telling the truth in campaigns and in PD print is what citizens want to hear and read.

Citizens in Ward 14 who are considering running against Santiago, don’t if the passion to do so is not for the “people”. Cleveland has too many politicians who claim they are for the causes of “people” but their actions have proven differently. Santiago had proven by his complacency in just one major area, which is his lack of passion to keep $400,000. in federal grant funds from moving out of the ward, that he is not what citizens consider, a “peoples” councilman. In defending his reasons, are reasons without documentation of accusations of “foul-play” against a few citizens, which had been attacked several times, would not pass muster among legalists in a court of law. Voters need to back candidates who can impress upon citizens, their zeal in finding ways to keep the funds from going into other wards. There is no reason to believe, if elected again, that Santiago will stop “giving the gift that keeps on giving”. And by so doing, he joins Jackson (if elected again) in his “allegiance” to the mayor in efforts to discriminate against all citizens in Ward 14 because of what both feel a few had done…or not done, based on personal goals, instead of ethically motivated, agendas that reflects upon the depth of public thinking.

A reminder. About a Web site that candidates for Council can use in connecting with citizens in their wards. It’s a neat site for all citizens in linking up with neighbors in sharing thoughts about what’s happening or should happen in the community. And using the Web sites assigned email address avoids using personal ones. For further info please click on the i-neighbors site

 

The following will be placed in an email addressed to Brent Larkin, senior editor for the Plain Dealer.

Here is one for the Plain Dealer. Whatever Happened to…

Invitations to read my articles (all) have been sent to the newspaper. Some have been rejected (most of the memos are sent to a favorite writer). However, I have imagined the uninvited, piercing sound of doors being shut, too often, when sending them to writers whose E addresses appear at the bottom of articles. My favorite writer does reply with courteous notes whenever emails become overwhelming by sending form memos back. Of course this does not always appease PD readers who may have spent careful time in addressing concerns. Perhaps, Larkin, can find a better way to address incoming commutation that at least provides reader/writers with clear thoughts of understanding to the reasons, instead of guessing what the silence may mean. On behalf of WebSite readers, I am requesting a response from Larkin to the concern below.  

On March, thirtieth 03, the PD released an article, “Feds want Cleveland to pay back millions from neighborhood plan”

Millions, 11.6 to be exact earmarked for projects meant to help people in Cleveland’s poorest neighborhoods was not documented. Auditors could not find accountability for the amount in question. City officials had 120 days to respond to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’ audit. This was not the first audit to have been scrutinized.

So! Did the PD follow up with an article after the 120 days was up? Or as officials insisted, tracking accountability of the money, would take at least a year. Either way, I found no clues in the PD that, doing the right thing was done. So! Whatever happened to…

Recently, Santiago addressed citizens by saying in part, that federal funding was reduced from one million to $400,000. to each ward. It seems Cleveland citizens are now getting short changed on needed federal funds because of some greedy politicians within City Hall.

“A Landscape of Blight – to a Politicians Delight”

Recently, Councilwoman Dona Brady stated, "I'm just very frustrated". She was expressing her feelings in a City Hall meeting, where other leaders were also venting the same to Jackson about the spread of blight into good neighborhoods by failing to put into effect housing codes. Was this just an exercise in dramatics, in getting a head start to next year’s election or the real thing? When Joe Zone appointed Brady to Council in 1999, was she motivated by her frustrations to carry them into City Hall, by joining other members in raising hell with Mike White about the growing problem of blight in Cleveland and how housing code neglects were adding to the problem? Or did she promise citizens in her first election campaign, out of earshot of the media, to do something about the blight? Did she live next to an abandon house? If she did, I suspect, citizens must have witnessed a demolition. Did it really take the current foreclosure crises to wake up Brady and other Council members? It seems that is the way this government operates. If the concerns have anything to do with the common folk, put the brakes on. Provide citizens with the excuse that sometimes works when City Hall goes begging for state and federal help when the budget has a money crunch. The problem citizens have with this excuse, is the city’s budget in not open. Some of it is, but like the school budget, it’s none of your (the citizens) business.

So what is Brady going to do about her “frustrated” outlook? Did it really take nine years of looking upon a landscape of blight before uttering the word “frustrated”? No, I surmise the word she would never utter in public, is complacency. She failed to connect her emotions with those of citizens around her. Nine years of frustrations really belong to citizens who complained directly or indirectly to Brady about neighborhood blight. If Brady was a “peoples” councilwoman, she would have asked for volunteers, citizens who were disgusted with all the blight, to peacefully join her in a Council chamber meeting with other leaders, and the media, and if needed to meet again and again, until something was done to have removed a good bit of the “blight” and “frustrations” from the minds of V.I.P’s (the volunteers)…long before Jackson became mayor.

My comments above are not exclusively directed to Brady. Citizens in all the wards have felt the same frustrations toward their own Council leaders. If leaders feels offended by the words “…to a Politicians Delight” in the title of this article, start demonstrating to citizens the opposite. And welcome the THINKING of citizens (the V.I P.’s), to Council chambers. Without them, the major issue of blight in Cleveland, well hardly become a minor issue any time soon.

A few years back, I lifted a Web page (please click here )that centered attention on political abuse in the area of blight (a vacant house) in Cleveland. Although the political figure here centers on Santiago’s back turning, citizens from most of the wards can relate. The time period of the log started soon after Santiago was elected to Council, and includes several photos of the house. Someone took a campaign sign of his and placed it in front of the door. I emailed the pictures to him, so he had no reason to refute a citizens plea (many) to do something about a property that’s been standing vacant for at least eight years. The log explains the rest and includes…

Jackson’s negligence in monitoring a project he created called Clean Cleveland. A rule he put in place was that properties would be cleaned at least once a month. No so. The log explains the rest.

Several emails were sent to Santiago concerning the property. All of them went ignored. All are included in the log. And all Council members received invites to read the log. And all remained silent about the log.

But all members in a unified Council voice encouraged Word 14 citizens to vote against Santiago’s recall. Silence revealed. The act revealed the dark side of local politics. Which is interference in a private affair between a Councilperson and citizens of Ward 14. Democracy was not demonstrated in the act.

It’s January 2009. Time to announce the symbolic Rotten Tomato Award. Setting members in Council deserve it for their participation in Councilman Joe Santiago’s recall election. But the spotlight is cast upon Santiago alone. The reasons have been clearly echoed by citizens and documented throughout this WebSite. If there is anyone who feels the selection is unjust, email the reasons. I will place them at the bottom of this article.

When certain government leaders become unapproachable when civic issue need attention, the search for resolutions should only become a future challenge. Giving up is a victory of sorts for some politicians who feel, citizens should be seen but not heard. After giving Santiago enough time to do the right thing about the house of blight. Or at least explain to nearby residents of the grungy sight, the reasons for his none involvement, I addressed a letter to Judge Raymond Pianka, for Cleveland’s Housing Court. One letter, that’s all it took to gain courteous attention. Close to three years, Santiago proved to citizens, he is not a “peoples” councilman. But close to three months later, Judge Pianka had copies of legal documents attached to the house, which basically condemned the property and gave City Hall a deadline to bring it down.

Adding onto the tradition of poor services to the community, the deadline came and went. The “tradition” can be found in how politicians neglected their own rules in beautify the landscape. City Hall sent a clear message to residents waiting to see the house come down. Court orders can be tested to a certain point. So wait and than watch as the house comes down and if THINKING gets in the way, the demolition should not be compared with suburban standards. Cleveland is in a money crunch. But THINKING also raises the question, when is City Hall not in a money crunch? 

The demolition contract did not include leveling the land for the seeding of grass, a basic rule contractors charge for if done. Instead, residents are now looking upon debris in the winter and weeds in the summer. Why, because Clean Cleveland (Jackson) is not living up the projects mandate, of at least one cleanup per month. City Hall cut the cost for demolition, but when politicians find ways to make money by putting out money, there seems to be plenty of greens.

The log will continue to provide information. Jackson needs to spruce up his thoughts in getting Clean Cleveland to live up to the promise of at least, once a month clean ups. But at least the open lot is no longer open to crime scenes.

But for every house that goes down, citizens are pleading for another to do the same. People on a daily bases call police, and council offices, to report illegal activity going on in vacant houses. And depending on how busy officers become, many show up hours after the fact, or as one retired police officer claimed in the email below, not at all. Many criminals with the minds of two year olds invade vacant houses to do whatever…without fright of being caught by the police.

E mail, dated October 24, 2008

Many houses on the East side have been left vacant from foreclosures. These houses are being ravaged at an epidemic rate, by thieves that enter them and strip the places bare of anything that can be resold or sold for recycle right down to the wall sockets and the kitchen sink. This also includes aluminum siding. Neighbors have called police only to be told they would not respond without an owner present.

I had purchased some houses with the intent to rehab. These houses were entered nightly and have been damaged by theft to the point of total loss.

After the damage was done, the building inspector comes by and condemns the houses, usurps the property, demolishes them, thus accumulating property for redevelopment. This also eliminates low cost housing for poor minority people, causing them to move on.

I wonder if a neighbor reporting seeing a child grabbed off the street, and dragged into a vacant house, the police would refuse to respond without an owner present.

The police have denied the “not respond” to me, but a local attorney checked and confirmed its existence.

If there are any questions about my qualifications to criticize, I am retired now, but have 18 years experience with city law enforcement and an MS in Administration of Justice.

James Stumpf, Arizona. An outraged retied police officer.

PS Don't go away on vacation. Who knows what will be left when you return.

 

To be continued…                                                                                                                                  

Previous articles in series                                                                                                                            Part One – Biographical Illusions                                                                                                             Part Two - Should Voters Prosecute the Prosecutor                                                                                Part Three - The Gift That Keeps On Giving

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =                                                     

lhough36@att.net 

HomePage     

Old Glory